![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
Dear Sci Fi Channel,
« previous entry | next entry »
Nov. 8th, 2008 | 05:22 pm
location: Fort Wainwright, Alaska
mood: 
pissed off
music: Battlestar Galactica -- Season One
Some of us actually LIKE "space shows." We like the spaceships, and the aliens, and the philosophy of it all. We want the weird.
Human drama = totally okay, but if you're going to make a show about humans and cyborgs (I'M TALKING TO YOU, BATTLESTAR GALACTICA), how about making it more than a soap opera in space?
I know you're trying to get new viewers, but is it worth losing the old viewers? The ones that not just buy the DVD's but the merchandise? The ones who go to the conventions and blog and make fan videos? You know, your FAN BASE?
I'm also talking to you, STAR TREK. ENTERPRISE was the worst bit of fanfiction ever made. It isn't real Star Trek. Please quit trying to pass it off as such. (I mean, seriously, did you just do it so that Endgame wouldn't be the worst series finale Paramount ever made?)
Minor love,
Heather Mac.
Human drama = totally okay, but if you're going to make a show about humans and cyborgs (I'M TALKING TO YOU, BATTLESTAR GALACTICA), how about making it more than a soap opera in space?
I know you're trying to get new viewers, but is it worth losing the old viewers? The ones that not just buy the DVD's but the merchandise? The ones who go to the conventions and blog and make fan videos? You know, your FAN BASE?
I'm also talking to you, STAR TREK. ENTERPRISE was the worst bit of fanfiction ever made. It isn't real Star Trek. Please quit trying to pass it off as such. (I mean, seriously, did you just do it so that Endgame wouldn't be the worst series finale Paramount ever made?)
Minor love,
Heather Mac.
(no subject)
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
allagainst
date: Nov. 9th, 2008 03:29 am (UTC)
link
reply | thread
(no subject)
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
orbitaldiamonds
date: Nov. 9th, 2008 03:36 am (UTC)
link
reply | parent | thread
(no subject)
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
allagainst
date: Nov. 9th, 2008 03:38 am (UTC)
link
lmao, tbh I actually prefer the soapness over the sci-fi factor.
reply | parent | thread
(no subject)
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
orbitaldiamonds
date: Nov. 9th, 2008 03:43 am (UTC)
link
reply | parent | thread
(no subject)
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
writer_atdusk
date: Nov. 9th, 2008 06:33 pm (UTC)
link
I probably should watch Star Trek one of these days...I don't know where to find it though, help me out here? XD
reply | thread
(no subject)
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
orbitaldiamonds
date: Nov. 10th, 2008 12:17 am (UTC)
link
reply | parent | thread
Sci-Fi Channel
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
navytron89
date: Nov. 9th, 2008 10:54 pm (UTC)
link
Unfortunately she's pissing away the original viewers by dragging crappy shows into the series like all these new reality shows that belong on Faux Network and not on Sci-Fi Channel. I think she's actually trying to kill of the Sci-Fi Channel.
reply | thread
Re: Sci-Fi Channel
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
orbitaldiamonds
date: Nov. 10th, 2008 12:20 am (UTC)
link
reply | parent | thread
(no subject)
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
jakobmorningstr
date: Nov. 10th, 2008 08:29 pm (UTC)
link
reply | thread
(no subject)
from:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
orbitaldiamonds
date: Nov. 11th, 2008 07:33 am (UTC)
link
reply | parent | thread